Serving Plaintiff & Defense Attorneys Nationwide

(702) 696-8745

Home / Expert Witness by State / Idaho

Idaho · Obvious intoxication + 180-day notice

Idaho Dram Shop & Hospitality Expert Witness

Ryan Dahlstrom accepts hospitality and entertainment expert-witness engagements in Idaho. 35+ years of hands-on experience in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, live entertainment venues and special events — retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants.

In short

Ryan Dahlstrom is a hospitality and entertainment industry expert witness who accepts engagements in Idaho. He has more than 35 years of hands-on experience in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, live entertainment venues and special events, and is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants. In Idaho matters he evaluates hospitality and venue operations, alcohol service and overservice, bar and nightclub operations, restaurant operations and management, security operations and negligent security, premises liability, event management, event security, event and stage safety, and surveillance video analysis. The governing framework in Idaho is Idaho Code § 23-808. His opinions address operational standards — staffing, training, supervision, policy and procedure — and do not extend to engineering, toxicology or medical causation.

Idaho Law

Obvious intoxication + 180-day notice

Idaho Code § 23-808 allows a person injured by an intoxicated person to claim against whoever sold or furnished the alcohol, in two circumstances: where the recipient was underage and the provider knew or reasonably should have known that, or where the recipient was obviously intoxicated and the provider knew or should have known that.

Idaho imposes a notice requirement: the claimant must notify the defendant within 180 days. As in every short-notice state, the practical consequence is that surveillance and service records must be secured long before the pleadings are settled.

The statute's constructive-knowledge limb — knew or should have known — is where operational evidence carries the case. What a reasonably prudent server should have observed is measured against staffing, sightlines, service pace and the venue's own training and policy.

Governing provision
Idaho Code § 23-808
Standard
Claim available where alcohol was furnished to an underage person or to an obviously intoxicated person, with knowledge or constructive knowledge; 180-day notice required.
Server training
Idaho ABC supports alcohol server training; some local jurisdictions impose additional requirements.

Statutes and regulatory schemes change, and this is not legal advice. Citations were verified against the state code or controlling decision and the named regulator at the time of writing; counsel should confirm the provision current to the date of loss. Ryan offers opinions on operational standards, not on the law itself.

Hospitality Context

Idaho Venues and Operations

Idaho's licensed trade includes Boise's downtown bar and restaurant district, Sun Valley and Schweitzer resort food and beverage with a pronounced winter season, Coeur d'Alene's lakefront and resort venues, and a substantial event and festival trade in the summer months.

Evidence

What Ryan Reviews in a Idaho Matter

  • Service and POS records correlated into an operational timeline.
  • Surveillance video across the service period, reviewed for observable indicators and reconciled against records and testimony.
  • Training and certification records for the staff actually on shift, measured against the state's server-training scheme.
  • Written policy and procedure — and whether practice matched the document.
  • Staffing, supervision and deployment at the relevant time, including security posts and ratios against actual occupancy.
  • Incident reports and prior-incident history bearing on foreseeability.

Scope

Areas Ryan May Be Retained On in Idaho

Where relevant to the matter. Ryan is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants; opinions follow the facts and the applicable standard of care, not the retaining party.

Hospitality

  • Hospitality operations
  • Hospitality management
  • Venue operations
  • Hotel operations
  • Management practices
  • Policies and procedures
  • Employee training
  • Operational standards

Alcohol service

  • Dram shop
  • Liquor liability
  • Alcohol service
  • Alcohol overservice
  • Responsible beverage service
  • Alcohol service to minors

Bar, nightclub & restaurant

  • Bar operations
  • Bar management
  • Nightclub operations
  • Nightclub management
  • Restaurant operations
  • Restaurant management
  • Beverage operations

Security

  • Security operations
  • Bar security
  • Nightclub security
  • Event security
  • Negligent security
  • Crowd management
  • Crowd control

Premises & events

  • Premises liability
  • Event management
  • Event operations
  • Event safety
  • Event & stage safety
  • Special event management

Analysis

  • Surveillance video analysis
  • Surveillance video compilation
  • Incident timeline analysis
  • Standard of care review

Availability

Idaho Engagements

Available for Idaho engagements

Ryan Dahlstrom accepts expert-witness engagements in Idaho and in all 50 states. His CV documents engagements in nine jurisdictions — Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Illinois, Utah, Washington, California, New York and Kentucky. Where a state is not among those, it means no engagement there is publicly disclosed in the CV; it does not limit availability, and the operational standards at issue in hospitality and entertainment litigation do not change at a state line. What changes is the cause of action available and the evidence that proves it.

See the full disclosed case record →

Questions

Idaho — Common Questions from Counsel

How long do I have to give notice of an Idaho dram shop claim?
Idaho Code § 23-808 requires notice to the defendant within 180 days. Evidence preservation should begin immediately, because surveillance retention at most venues is far shorter.
What does 'obviously intoxicated' mean in Idaho?
That the person's intoxication was apparent, and that the provider knew or reasonably should have known of it. The constructive-knowledge limb makes staffing, sightlines and training central.
What is different about a ski-resort venue case?
Service patterns differ — day drinking across a long afternoon, altitude, cold-weather clothing masking some behavioural signs, and a workforce that is largely seasonal. Each affects what a reasonably prudent operator should have trained staff to watch for.

Idaho Matter Under Review?

Submit a case inquiry for a confidential conflicts check and evaluation. Ryan responds to all inquiries within one business day.