Draskovich v. Richards Bar
Bar SecurityDram Shop
Case Review · Expert Report · Deposition · Settled
Case experience: Bar Security · Dram Shop · Security Operations · Bar Operations
Serving Plaintiff & Defense Attorneys Nationwide
(702) 696-8745Home / Expert Witness by State / Illinois
Illinois · Dramshop Act and statutory caps
Deposition testimony given in the Circuit Court of Cook County on a bar security and dram shop matter. Illinois imposes liability without a visible-intoxication element — and caps what can be recovered.
Applicable Law
Illinois liability arises under 235 ILCS 5/6-21, the Dramshop Act. A person injured in person or property by an intoxicated person has a right of action against any licensee who caused the intoxication of that person.
Illinois is structurally different from most dram shop states: the statute does not require proof that the patron appeared visibly intoxicated at the time of service. Causing the intoxication is the operative question, which shifts the evidentiary weight onto service volume, pace and records rather than onto observed behaviour.
Recovery is capped. The Dramshop Act's limits are adjusted annually for inflation and published by the Illinois Comptroller — for judgments or settlements on or after 20 January 2026, the cap for injury to person or property is $90,411.55 per person injured, with a separate limit for loss of support or society. Where more than one dramshop is liable the limits apply to their collective liability. Counsel should confirm the figure current to the date of judgment.
Statutes and regulatory schemes change. The citations above are starting points for counsel, verified at the time of writing against the state code and the regulator named — they are not legal advice, and Ryan does not offer opinions on the law itself.
Evidence
The evidence set follows the legal standard. Where the statute turns on what was observable, the analysis runs on video, service records and staffing; where it turns on security or premises conditions, it runs on deployment, supervision and incident history.
Disclosed Illinois Experience
Draskovich v. Richards Bar — Circuit Court of Cook County (2022 L 063072), retained by Pullano & Siporin for the plaintiff on bar security and dram shop issues. Case review, expert report and deposition testimony in March 2026; the matter settled.
Bar SecurityDram Shop
Case Review · Expert Report · Deposition · Settled
Case experience: Bar Security · Dram Shop · Security Operations · Bar Operations
Questions
Other Jurisdictions
Ryan is available nationwide. These are the jurisdictions his CV documents.
Submit a case inquiry for a confidential conflicts check and evaluation. Ryan responds to all inquiries within one business day.