Draskovich v. Richards Bar
Bar SecurityDram Shop
Case Review · Expert Report · Deposition
Outcome: Settled
Case experience: Bar Security · Dram Shop · Security Operations · Bar Operations
Serving Plaintiff & Defense Attorneys Nationwide
(702) 696-8745Home / Expert Witness by State / Illinois
Illinois · Dramshop Act and statutory caps
Ryan Dahlstrom accepts expert-witness engagements in Illinois and is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants. He evaluates alcohol-service practices, bar security, staffing and supervision against hospitality industry standards.
Alcohol Service
The Illinois Dramshop Act, 235 ILCS 5/6-21
Illinois liability arises under 235 ILCS 5/6-21, the Dramshop Act. A person injured in person or property by an intoxicated person has a right of action against any licensee who caused the intoxication of that person.
Illinois is structurally different from most dram shop states: the statute does not require proof that the patron appeared visibly intoxicated at the time of service. Causing the intoxication is the operative question, which shifts the evidentiary weight onto service volume, pace and records rather than onto observed behavior.
Recovery is capped. The Dramshop Act's limits are adjusted annually for inflation and published by the Illinois Comptroller — for judgments or settlements on or after 20 January 2026, the cap for injury to person or property is $90,411.55 per person injured, with a separate limit for loss of support or society. Where more than one dramshop is liable the limits apply to their collective liability.
This summary is general information for counsel, not legal advice. Statutes, regulations and case law change; counsel should confirm the law in effect on the date of loss. Ryan Dahlstrom's opinions address operational practices measured against hospitality industry standards; he does not offer opinions on the law.
Evidence
The evidence set follows the legal standard. Where the statute turns on what was observable, the analysis runs on video, service records and staffing; where it turns on security or premises conditions, it runs on deployment, supervision and incident history.
Selected Engagements
Ryan was retained by Pullano & Siporin for the plaintiff in Draskovich v. Richards Bar, Circuit Court of Cook County (2022 L 063072), on bar security and dram shop issues. Case review, expert report and deposition; the matter settled.
Bar SecurityDram Shop
Case Review · Expert Report · Deposition
Outcome: Settled
Case experience: Bar Security · Dram Shop · Security Operations · Bar Operations
Questions
Other Jurisdictions
Ryan Dahlstrom accepts expert-witness engagements in all 50 states.
Submit a case inquiry for a confidential conflicts check and evaluation. Ryan responds to case inquiries within one business day.