Home / Expert Witness by State / Indiana
Indiana · Actual knowledge required
Indiana Dram Shop & Bar Operations Expert Witness
Ryan Dahlstrom accepts hospitality and entertainment expert-witness engagements in Indiana. 35+ years of hands-on experience in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, live entertainment venues and special events — retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants.
In short
Ryan Dahlstrom is a hospitality and entertainment industry expert witness who accepts engagements in Indiana. He has more than 35 years of hands-on experience in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, live entertainment venues and special events, and is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants. In Indiana matters he evaluates hospitality and venue operations, alcohol service and overservice, bar and nightclub operations, restaurant operations and management, security operations and negligent security, premises liability, event management, event security, event and stage safety, and surveillance video analysis. His opinions address operational standards — alcohol-service practices, staffing, training, supervision, policy and procedure, security, crowd management and incident response — measured against hospitality industry standards. He does not offer opinions on the law, engineering, toxicology or medical causation.
Alcohol Service
Dram Shop and Liquor Liability in Indiana
Actual knowledge required
Indiana's dram shop provision is Ind. Code § 7.1-5-10-15.5. Liability arises where the person furnishing the alcohol had actual knowledge that the person served was visibly intoxicated, and that intoxication was a proximate cause of the resulting injury.
Actual knowledge is the distinguishing feature. Indiana does not accept a constructive-knowledge theory: the question is what the server or the establishment actually knew, not what a reasonable server should have realized. Actual knowledge may be shown through direct or circumstantial evidence.
That evidential demand shifts the case onto records and observable conduct: a documented tab showing repeated service, video showing the patron's condition at the point of sale, a refusal that was later reversed, a manager who was told, or a server's own account. It is an unusually operational standard, and cases are frequently won or lost on how well the venue's own systems documented what staff saw.
This summary is general information for counsel, not legal advice. Statutes, regulations and case law change; counsel should confirm the law in effect on the date of loss. Ryan Dahlstrom's opinions address operational practices measured against hospitality industry standards; he does not offer opinions on the law.
Hospitality Context
Indiana Venues and Operations
Indiana's licensed trade includes Indianapolis's Broad Ripple and downtown districts, a very large event hospitality operation around the Motor Speedway and convention calendar, Bloomington's college bar corridor, and Lake Michigan casino properties in the northwest of the state.
Evidence
What Ryan Reviews in Indiana Matters
- Service and POS records correlated into an operational timeline.
- Surveillance video across the service period, reviewed for observable indicators and reconciled against records and testimony.
- Training and certification records for the staff actually on shift, measured against the state's server-training scheme.
- Written policy and procedure — and whether practice matched the document.
- Staffing, supervision and deployment at the relevant time, including security posts and ratios against actual occupancy.
- Incident reports and prior-incident history bearing on foreseeability.
Scope
Areas Ryan May Be Retained On in Indiana
Where relevant to the matter. Ryan is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants; opinions follow the facts and the applicable standard of care, not the retaining party.
Hospitality
- Hospitality operations
- Hospitality management
- Venue operations
- Hotel operations
- Management practices
- Policies and procedures
- Employee training
- Operational standards
Alcohol service
- Dram shop
- Liquor liability
- Alcohol service
- Alcohol overservice
- Responsible beverage service
- Alcohol service to minors
Bar, nightclub & restaurant
- Bar operations
- Bar management
- Nightclub operations
- Nightclub management
- Restaurant operations
- Restaurant management
- Beverage operations
Security
- Security operations
- Bar security
- Nightclub security
- Event security
- Negligent security
- Crowd management
- Crowd control
Premises & events
- Premises liability
- Event management
- Event operations
- Event safety
- Event & stage safety
- Special event management
Analysis
- Surveillance video analysis
- Surveillance video compilation
- Incident timeline analysis
- Standard of care review
Availability
Indiana Engagements
Ryan Dahlstrom accepts expert-witness engagements in Indiana and throughout the United States, and has been retained in matters by plaintiff and defense counsel nationwide. The hospitality industry standards that govern alcohol service, staffing, training and security apply wherever a venue operates; what differs from state to state is the governing law and what must be proven.
His case experience includes matters in Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Illinois, Utah, Washington, California, New York, Kentucky and other jurisdictions, involving dram shop and liquor liability, security, premises liability, hospitality operations, event safety, restaurant management and bar operations.
Questions
Indiana — Common Questions from Counsel
Why is Indiana's standard harder to meet than most states'?
How is actual knowledge established in practice?
Do Indiana server permits matter evidentially?
Indiana Matter Under Review?
Submit a case inquiry for a confidential conflicts check and evaluation. Ryan responds to case inquiries within one business day.