Serving Plaintiff & Defense Attorneys Nationwide

(702) 696-8745

Home / Expert Witness by State / Michigan

Michigan · Name-and-retain requirement

Michigan Dram Shop & Bar Operations Expert Witness

Ryan Dahlstrom accepts hospitality and entertainment expert-witness engagements in Michigan. 35+ years of hands-on experience in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, live entertainment venues and special events — retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants.

In short

Ryan Dahlstrom is a hospitality and entertainment industry expert witness who accepts engagements in Michigan. He has more than 35 years of hands-on experience in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, live entertainment venues and special events, and is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants. In Michigan matters he evaluates hospitality and venue operations, alcohol service and overservice, bar and nightclub operations, restaurant operations and management, security operations and negligent security, premises liability, event management, event security, event and stage safety, and surveillance video analysis. His opinions address operational standards — alcohol-service practices, staffing, training, supervision, policy and procedure, security, crowd management and incident response — measured against hospitality industry standards. He does not offer opinions on the law, engineering, toxicology or medical causation.

Alcohol Service

Dram Shop and Liquor Liability in Michigan

Name-and-retain requirement

Michigan's Dram Shop Act sits in the Liquor Control Code at MCL § 436.1801. A retail licensee may not directly or indirectly sell, furnish or give alcohol to an individual who is visibly intoxicated, and a person injured by that individual may bring an action against the licensee.

Visibly intoxicated is not defined by a fixed test; Michigan courts have treated it as intoxication apparent to an ordinary observer. The standard focuses on observable signs at the time of service rather than on blood alcohol content, which is why video and service records usually matter more than toxicology alone.

Michigan's distinctive procedural feature is the name-and-retain requirement: the alleged visibly intoxicated person must be named in the action and retained until its conclusion. The purpose is to prevent collusion by keeping that person financially exposed, and it shapes both pleading strategy and the practical dynamics of settlement.

Governing provision
MCL § 436.1801
Standard
Retail licensee liable for service to a visibly intoxicated person; the alleged intoxicated person must be named and retained in the action.
Server training
Michigan operates server training approved through the Liquor Control Commission for licensee staff.

This summary is general information for counsel, not legal advice. Statutes, regulations and case law change; counsel should confirm the law in effect on the date of loss. Ryan Dahlstrom's opinions address operational practices measured against hospitality industry standards; he does not offer opinions on the law.

Hospitality Context

Michigan Venues and Operations

Michigan's licensed trade includes Detroit's entertainment and casino district, Grand Rapids' large brewery and taproom sector, Ann Arbor and East Lansing college bar corridors, and northern Michigan seasonal resort and marina operations.

Evidence

What Ryan Reviews in Michigan Matters

  • Service and POS records correlated into an operational timeline.
  • Surveillance video across the service period, reviewed for observable indicators and reconciled against records and testimony.
  • Training and certification records for the staff actually on shift, measured against the state's server-training scheme.
  • Written policy and procedure — and whether practice matched the document.
  • Staffing, supervision and deployment at the relevant time, including security posts and ratios against actual occupancy.
  • Incident reports and prior-incident history bearing on foreseeability.

Scope

Areas Ryan May Be Retained On in Michigan

Where relevant to the matter. Ryan is retained by attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants; opinions follow the facts and the applicable standard of care, not the retaining party.

Hospitality

  • Hospitality operations
  • Hospitality management
  • Venue operations
  • Hotel operations
  • Management practices
  • Policies and procedures
  • Employee training
  • Operational standards

Alcohol service

  • Dram shop
  • Liquor liability
  • Alcohol service
  • Alcohol overservice
  • Responsible beverage service
  • Alcohol service to minors

Bar, nightclub & restaurant

  • Bar operations
  • Bar management
  • Nightclub operations
  • Nightclub management
  • Restaurant operations
  • Restaurant management
  • Beverage operations

Security

  • Security operations
  • Bar security
  • Nightclub security
  • Event security
  • Negligent security
  • Crowd management
  • Crowd control

Premises & events

  • Premises liability
  • Event management
  • Event operations
  • Event safety
  • Event & stage safety
  • Special event management

Analysis

  • Surveillance video analysis
  • Surveillance video compilation
  • Incident timeline analysis
  • Standard of care review

Availability

Michigan Engagements

Ryan Dahlstrom accepts expert-witness engagements in Michigan and throughout the United States, and has been retained in matters by plaintiff and defense counsel nationwide. The hospitality industry standards that govern alcohol service, staffing, training and security apply wherever a venue operates; what differs from state to state is the governing law and what must be proven.

His case experience includes matters in Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Illinois, Utah, Washington, California, New York, Kentucky and other jurisdictions, involving dram shop and liquor liability, security, premises liability, hospitality operations, event safety, restaurant management and bar operations.

View representative matters

Questions

Michigan — Common Questions from Counsel

What is Michigan's name-and-retain requirement?
The alleged visibly intoxicated person must be named as a defendant and retained in the action until its conclusion. The rule exists to deter collusion by keeping that person financially exposed.
How is 'visibly intoxicated' judged in Michigan?
As intoxication apparent to an ordinary observer, focused on observable signs at the time of service rather than on blood alcohol content.
Do brewery taprooms raise distinct issues in Michigan?
Yes. Higher-ABV product and flight or sampling formats make actual consumption easy to underestimate, and taproom service models often lack the single-tab tracking a traditional bar provides.

Michigan Matter Under Review?

Submit a case inquiry for a confidential conflicts check and evaluation. Ryan responds to case inquiries within one business day.